That requires review of the actual contracts and applicable law by the appropriate adviser. Immigration preparation should not silently select the more convenient version. Resolve or explain the operative arrangement and submit accurate evidence of the funds and conditions being relied on.
Obtain a documented clarification
Identify the conflicting provisions and ask the responsible parties to address them through the appropriate legal process. Preserve the history and any valid amendments. A revised immigration summary cannot itself amend the commercial contract or make the money committed on different terms.
Begin with executed agreements, escrow instructions, bank statements, sale records, entity documents, forecasts, and operating commitments. The first review should produce a source-to-use ledger linking each claim to a dated record and noting conflicts.; each conclusion should point to the record that settles it. Next, obtain signed versions before relying on a broker's description. This order keeps a later explanation from being asked to repair a missing fact. What commonly goes wrong is a later summary cannot change a refund provision or missing ownership term. Preserve dated source material and identify the unresolved issue instead of using a confident generalization. Hypothetical example: A bicycle-repair entrepreneur finds different release triggers in escrow and closing instructions. The review preserves both versions and obtains commercial clarification instead of choosing the better wording. The decision is whether the actual record supports the proposed activity now, requires a different sequence, or calls for a separate route. E-2 requires treaty nationality, a real enterprise, and an investor who will develop and direct it. Capital must be committed in a manner that exposes it to commercial loss, and the enterprise cannot be marginal.