That is a judgement for the applicant, but where a program is recent and its procedures are still settling, waiting costs little and re-verifying costs nothing. The one thing that should never be rushed is a large irrevocable payment made on the basis of a summary rather than the official terms.
Separate urgency from pressure
Genuine urgency comes from the applicant's own circumstances: a school year, a contract, a family member's health. Manufactured urgency comes from someone who benefits from a quick decision, and the two feel similar in the moment. Write down the reason the decision must be made now, and test it.
If the reason is a deadline the household controls, it can be moved. Meanwhile, use the time to read the official materials properly, obtain an assessment of admissibility, and price the alternatives, so that whenever the decision is made it rests on the program's actual terms. If a professional or intermediary presses for payment before those steps are complete, that pressure is itself information about the quality of the advice.
Hypothetical example: a pharmaceutical distributor faces an expiring business opportunity and wants to send funds before current instructions are confirmed. Urgency does not make an unclear process safer. Build a decision calendar around the official availability of applications, document preparation, payment evidence, and ordinary immigration alternatives.
A first review should separate a commercial deadline from a legal eligibility date. The recurring mistake is treating an announced programme as an approved case, then committing funds or ending employment before the applicant has a viable, documented process.